FLEET: League Creative Play Day

Sunday 11 August 2024, 2-5 pm
FLEET Edmonds
located in Edmonds Park

Bring both body and mind to League at Edmonds Park in Burnaby for an innovative gathering to practice creative problem-solving through play. Since it’s also the last day of the Olympic Games, bring a piece of fabric you could use as an improvised flag.

League is an initiative that uses play as a way to develop creativity. It is a series of free, all-ages meetups in which community members invent and play new games and sports. Participants exercise creativity through improvised, embodied problem-solving and problem-making. Everyone is welcome, whether or not you are a gamer, athlete or artist.

At this first League event in Burnaby, we will warm up by playing some games invented at previous gatherings, and play together to evolve and test new ones. The afternoon will be facilitated by League founder and FLEET contributor Germaine Koh, collaborators, and our hosts Burnaby Public Art.

All ages welcome to drop in to play at Edmonds Park near the FLEET studio between 2pm and 5pm on Sunday August 11.

League 15 June 2024 “Rain or Shine” graphic

Rain or Shine: around these parts, it’s one or the other. So bring an umbrella/parasol, and we’ll use those as a starting point.

League is a free and open gathering to invent and play new games and sports. We exercise embodied, improvised, creative problem-solving and problem-making. 

Join us at Hadden Park Field House on Saturday 15 June, 10 am – 2 pm, with @germkoh, other @leaguevan collaborators, and our friends at @publiksecrets. 

We have a new League newsletter, which will go out no more than once a month. Sign up here. 

Creativity is the name of the game with the n Games– the ultimate playful event created for adults!

The n Games is an innovative tournament of invented urban games in which diverse teams attempt to “solve for n, the unknown quantity”. Groups from all over the Lower Mainland are invited to be one of the six teams to participate. We expect entries from teams of diverse backgrounds, ages and skill-sets to tackle this set of unique games invented by Simon Fraser University School for the Contemporary Arts students, Assistant Professor James Long, and artist Germaine Koh.

The n Games value play as a form of creative problem-solving, prompting teams to take unconventional approaches to challenges involving both mind and body. This event is a new urban-space edition of the n Games (which were first presented by Koh in 2013). These games are sponsored by Downtown Vancouver Business Improvement Association.

n Games 2024 graphic

LEAGUE is a community-based initiative dedicated to the creative power of collective play and making. First initiated at Elm Park Field House by artist Germaine Koh and expanding to include a revolving cast of collaborators and participants, LEAGUE events are open to everyone who is open to the unpredictability of play. Just bring both body and mind.

 League at Hadden Park, 16 March 2024

]]> https://league.germainekoh.com/blog/?feed=rss2&p=7211 0 https://league.germainekoh.com/blog/?p=4517 https://league.germainekoh.com/blog/?p=4517#comments Tue, 17 Nov 2015 04:39:14 +0000 https://league.germainekoh.com/blog/?p=4517 Continue reading

PREDATOR-PREY 

A noctural game-playing night co-hosted by League, Manhunt! Vancouver, and Urban Animal Agency.

Join us at 5:30 PM near Second Beach on Thursday, November 19th, to improvise, invent and play chase- and tag- style games with an ecological theme. We’ll meet at the Urban Animal Agency Headquarters: the A-Frame at 8701 Stanley Park Drive. 

** Dress for outdoor Fall play and bring a flashlight! **
(We may invent games that use flashlights) 

We’ll have hot chocolate for everyone. 

League, launched by artist Germaine Koh, is an open group of people who gather to play sports and games invented by members of the community. Each game, its equipment, its playing field, and its strategies evolve through trial and improvisation. It’s problem-solving as play. http://league-league.org/ 

Manhunt has been active in Vancouver since 2005, we play a variety of schoolyard games in downtown Vancouver, like Manhunt, Capture the Flag, Sardines, etc. Manhunt attracts both the young the old, the slow and the fast, and is organized through a Facebook page and Meetup profile: http://www.meetup.com/Manhunt-Vancouver/

Urban Animal Agency is a collective of artists and ecologists interested in the ways that people and other animals collectively define urban spaces. We believe that it is possible to make artwork that can challenge, question and captivate, that can be informed by diverse ways of knowing, and that can be ecologically accountable. http://www.urbananimalagency.ca/

]]>

League is participating in an exhibition of work by all the Vancouver Park Board Field House Residency artists:

The Vancouver Park Board invites you to

Field Guides

Opening Reception:  Thursday, Sept. 18, 5-8PM
Guest Speaker- Matt Hern 6:30 PM
Roundhouse Exhibition Hall 181 Roundhouse Mews

Field Guides marks the culmination of the first cycle of the Vancouver Parks Board’s Artists Fieldhouse Studio Program – an initiative that transformed former care-takers cottages in parks across Vancouver into studio space for artists with community engaged practices. Over 50 artists (solo and in collectives) in all disciplines have been working in 12 field houses across Vancouver, bringing art into the everyday life of community, by inviting neighbours, colleagues and curious visitors to share in creative work. Field Guides celebrates this three year collaboration highlighting the intimate, generous and adventurous work of artists and community members working together as producers, practitioners and audience.

League play day — Sunday 28 September

Elm Park, 3-5 pm

League is an open group that gathers to play invented games and sports as a practice of creative problem-solving. We gather on the last Sunday of each month to improvise and strategize new ways of interacting. Our gatherings are free and open to all. They call for physical and mental activity, so bring both body and mind.

Team Double Rainbow at League’s n Games

League summer sports day

Team Theatre Replacement at League’s n Games

Sunday 27 July, noon to 3pm
Vanier Park
off Chestnut Street, Vancouver
map: https://goo.gl/maps/NfSbj

Everyone wants to be by the water in the summertime, so League is decamping to Vanier Park for a summer sports day. Come in teams, wear your colours, and bring hydration. We’ll develop games for small groups, plus individual challenges. Also bring appropriate equipment if you have games to try or mashups in mind.

League is an open group that gathers on the last Sunday of the month to play invented games and sports as a practice of creative problem-solving. Our gatherings are free and open to all; bring both body and mind.

Want to stay informed about League events? Sign up for our more-or-less-monthly mailing list here.

The Mill Project at League, April 2014

Field Lines
Saturday 14 June
10:30 am-12:30 pm
Elm Park

League is participating in this year’s Vancouver Draw Down, “an annual celebration of drawing in everyday life that challenges preconceptions about drawing and works to reconnect everyone with the power and creative pleasure of making marks.”

Join League at Elm Park to play at marking the field. Here drawing will involve full-body motion, running and walking with the field-marking equipment, and participants will work together to invent a game to match the lines.

Participants of all ages and experience are welcome.

Sunday 27 April — League play — Prisoner’s Dilemma

“Stuffie Dilemma,” a game developed with Bruce Emmett’s high school students at a League workshop in February 2013

Noon to 2pm at Elm Park

Prisoner’s Dilemma is a conundrum used in game theory to consider situations in which individuals might choose not to cooperate, even if it might be in their best interests to do so.

The protoypical situation: two gang members are arrested for a major crime and kept separated from each other. The police explain to each of them that there is not enough evidence to convict them on the main charge without one of them confessing, but they can both be convicted on a lesser charge. If one confesses, he will be set free and the other convicted for the maximum sentence. If both confess, they will both be convicted, but serve fewer years. If neither defects, they both serve less time on the lesser charge.

Many specific strategies and real-life examples of cooperation and betrayal have been identified as types of prisoners’ dilemma. For this League play day we’ll explore some of them.

League events are free of charge and open to all. We gather to play sports and games as a practice of creative problem solving. Each game, its equipment, its playing field, and its strategies evolve through trial and improvisation. Drop in prepared for action.

Tuesday 29 April — PushupKucha

7pm at Elm Park field house, 5837 Larch Street (map)

PushupKucha is a new active salon concept that plays on the short presentation format, augmenting ideas with practice. Not only do PushupKucha presenters convey their ideas in a few short minutes, but they also include physical audience action.

The first edition of PushupKucha will take place in and around the Elm Park field house on Tuesday 29 April at 7pm.

Presenters tackling questions of cooperation and neighbourliness are:

• Matt Hern, author of One Game At A Time: Why Sports Matter
• Adrienne Pierce and Ari Shine, the musician collaborators known as The Royal Oui
• Justin Langlois of Windsor-based Broken City Lab, a collective whose creative practice leans towards civic change
• Members of the Mill Community Project concerned with the presently-buried Inglewood “Mill” skatepark in West Vancouver.
• Nick Boulding, teacher in Take A Hike adventure-based education program for youth at risk.

Audience:  Come prepared for action. Attendance will be limited; join the facebook event here.

by Louise Rusch
Visiting student from Simon Fraser University Arts & Culture Studies

Aristotle defined a worthy life as embodying “intellectual and moral excellence” (Feezell 136). The art of sport is about a performance that can only be achieved through a highly disciplined and focused process. A quick search can list the achievement history of any sport, but there are some sport stories that are mythologized in academic research and popular media. These stories are treasured because they reflect the person as more than a species of physical distinction. They reflect a desire to judge the worthiness of sports as not only the pursuit of physical superiority, but also on the other side of the Aristotelian equation: moral excellence.

Justin Wadsworth giving Anton Gafarov a ski, 2014 Winter Olympic Games. Image from http://www.huffingtonpost.ca.

During the 2014 Winter Olympic Games, Cathal Kelly,sports columnist for the Toronto Star, wrote a story about Canadian cross-country ski coach Justin Wadsworth, who gave a ski to Russian Anton Gafarov so that he could cross the finish line with some dignity after he broke one of his skis. Wadsworth is married to Canadian skier Beckie Scott. This is relevant as it relates to a similar story from the 2006 Olympics in Torino, in which Norwegian official Bjornar Hakensmoen gave Canadian cross-country skier Sara Renner a pole while she and Scott were racing in the team sprint. That action helped the Canadian pair place second, pushing the Norwegians into fourth. Hakensmoen explains, “This competition, and all competitions, it should be a fight. It should not be decided by skis” (Kelly).

The story about Wadsworth and Hakensmoen resonates because it sets them apart from their peers. The performance honoured the sport because it combined an elite calibre of technical skill and a demonstration of integrity. The focus of the results shifted away from a best time and towards two opponents who were able to achieve a level of excellence. Yet not all of the coaches watching Gafarov ran to him with a ski. Why did Wadsworth and Hakensmoen consider fair play to be of such importance while others did not? Would some of the coaches have argued that Hakensmoen broke the rules and interfered in the competition, giving the Canadians an unfair advantage? Is there etiquette unique to cross country skiing that implicitly required Wadsworth and Hakensmoen to behave as they did? Or, placing the interest of the sport above his own, did Hakensmoen merely acknowledge his esteem for the sport? (Simon 46-52)

Craig Clifford and Randolph Feezell in Sport and Character argue that sportsmanship doesn’t develop naturally; it needs to be taught alongside the rules. This report argues that sportsmanship honours the nature of sport because it mediates between the playfulness of the game and the seriousness of competition (13-5/34).

Bernard Suits defines a game as a “voluntary attempt to overcome unnecessary obstacles” (Suits 55). The player wins by using their whole body to find a solution to an illogical situation. Clifford and Feezell define the difference between a game and a sport as the intensity added through competition. Winning, they explain, becomes meaningful when contests are governed by rules and traditions that impose a sense of fairness. Sport becomes the mediator between playfulness and seriousness. A competition is described as an expression of human greatness because opponents are able to pit their abilities, experiences and skills against each other, thus achieving a greater level of development, self-awareness and expertise. The implication is that the agreement to participate is as important as the contest (Clifford & Feezell 13-6). Bernard DeKoven adds that giving a game any less than your all violates its conventions. He explains his vision of sport as a conversation between play and game. Play is defined as being creative and magical, while a game is understood as focused and mindful. A game is well played when these two opposing concepts are bridged (DeKoven 520-3).

Diana Abad, citing James W. Keating, notes that sport is more than a physical performance. It is also about an attitude, and therefore sportsmanship is defined as a moral code that requires specific behaviours from the players. Abad defines these behaviours as “fairness, equity, good form or honour, and a will to win” (32). Though the qualities of sportsmanship can been observed in play and games, the seriousness of sport, specifically the desire to compete, creates a field in which moral distinction becomes a true part of the process (Abad 28). Clifford and Feezell define the spirit of competition as a tension between the cooperative need for an equitable opponent and the respect required for this level of self-awareness, pitted against the intense desire to win at all costs. Respect, they note, is offered when a person is able to see beyond their own needs and interests. Sportsmanship then becomes the mediator between the rules, the understanding of the sport, and the finite strengths each individual holds to be competitive. The socially constructed tension sportsmanship carries means that it is not innate; rather, its nuances need to be taught as they occur outside of the strict adherence to the rules while honouring the essence and the excellence of the sport (15/18-9/21/34).

In opposition to sportsmanship, gamesmanship is behaviour in which a player seeks an advantage that might not be restricted but is seen as inappropriate. (Clifford & Freezell 39) Robert Simon notes that the nature of competition creates inequality: one player will win and the other will lose. Using an academic example, he notes that inequality is not always a negative thing; grades for example, are considered fair inequality (36-7). Feezell, in his book Sport, Play and Ethical Reflection, defines a cheater as a player who gains an unfair advantage by violating the essence of the sport. Examples include choosing to: disregard a rule (usually a moral one), injure an opponent, refuse to respect a defeat (84-5). Simon clarifies this position further when he argues that cheaters violate the moral norms because they “fail to respect their opponents as persons, as agents with purposes of their own” (55). The ethos of sport then becomes more than playing by the rules as it moves into an arena which also includes the pursuit of an outstanding character (Clifford & Feezell 17) (Simon 49).

Yet, though not considered fair play, breaking or bending the rules makes space to create an evolution within a sport. As part of play, sports are a dynamic and potentially magical experience, and rules are an element that allow for this fluid nature (Huizinga 57). Suits argues that the rules are not the only component of the sport; they are only the accepted method of framing the barriers of the game’s challenge (Simon 43). The rules are created for the play and our own pleasure within a specific game; therefore changing the rules can also restore the balance between playing and gaming (DeKoven 523).

We follow rules even when we are not playing games; hence there will always be rules that are morally valid and supersede a game rule. Though all sports contain basic rules of operation, the exact rules are rarely precise and are often connected to dynamic social and cultural traditions. Logically, sports will change over time because the players and organizers do (Suits177/181). Yet many people would argue that rules changes render some games unrecognizable.

How do players ethically change rules? Simon argues for an adjudication process in which criteria based in ethics research are used to interpret the rules and examine each individual rule-bending situation. He argues for a criterion to probe the elements of sport in which impartial respect of the sport’s core ideals are examined. Through the process commonly used within the field of ethics, rule changes would always be examined using a reasonable, reflective and critical response to the situation in question (Simon 14). John. S. Russell argues that moral justification for playing with sport rules is best when changes within the actual contest are vetted through a principled examination of the goals and intentions of the sport, to ensure these are maintained and nurtured (Simon 51-2). These changes are accepted when they are transparent and necessary to restore the balance within the sport (DeKoven 523).

By referencing the earlier 2006 Olympic example, the Canadian cross-country team would not have won without the gift of the pole. If the Canadian coach had replaced the pole, it could be argued that he had given his team an unfair advantage. Within this international amateur competition, the intention of the sport and the abilities of the skiers became the overriding factor in the ethical interpretation of the actions of the opponents coach (Feezell 88/100-4) (Simon 52-5). It is important to remember that games are socially constructed; it isn’t “the game that is sacred, it’s the people who are playing” (DeKoven 523) (Suits 179-80). In other words, part of the magic of sport is the capacity to play on multiple levels of the process. Sportsmanship is people on a quest to develop technical and moral excellence through sport. The competitors require a nuanced comprehension and respect for the interrelationship between each other, the objective of the contest, while attempting to master the most difficult challenge. Therefore, argues Feezell, the “key to sportsmanship is the spirit of play” (94).

Works Cited

• Abad, Diane. “Sportsmanship.” Sport, Ethics and Philosophy. Vol. 4, No. 1, April 2010. pp. 27-41.
• Clifford, Craig and Feezell, Randolph M. Sport and Character: Reclaiming the Principles of Sportsmanship. Windsor, Ontario: Human Kinetics, Inc., 2010.
• DeKoven, Bernard. “Changing the Game”. Salen, Katie and Zimmerman, Eric. Rules of Play: Game Design Fundamentals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2004. pp.518-537.
• Feezell, Randolph. Sport, Play, and Ethical Reflection. Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 2004.
• Kelly, Cathal. “Canadian coach’s act of kindness in cross country skiing at Sochi Olympics reflects all of us.” Toronto Star. http://www.thestar.com/sports/sochi2014/skiing/2014/02/11/canadian_coach_lends_helping_hand_to_russian_skier_in_cross_country_skiing_at_sochi_olympics.html
• Loland, Sigmund. Fair Play in Sport. New York: Routledge, 2001.
• Simon, Robert L. Fair Play: the Ethics of Sport. Philadelphia: Westview Press, 2010.
• Suits, Bernard. The Grasshopper: Games, Life and Utopia. Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview Press, 2005 (1978).
• Suits, Bernard. “Construction of a Definition”. Salen, Katie and Zimmerman, Eric. Rules of Play: Game Design Fundamentals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2004. pp. 172-191.

Other Resources

• http://www.olympic.org/olympism-in-action/
• http://campaignforcourtesy.org.uk/uncategorized/pr-smiths-ted-talk-on-great-sportsmanship
• http://ca.phaidon.com/agenda/art/articles/2013/march/01/how-robert-rauschenberg-erased-a-willem-de-kooning-and-created-a-landmark-of-postmodernism/